It’s a Good Life vs Twilight Zone Essay

After comparing the novel Its A Good breeding by Jerome Bixby to the movie adaptation of Twilight Zone, I found some(prenominal) differences in each account. In Jerome Bixbys version, Anthony is a 3 socio-economic class honest-to-god little boy. He has purple eyes, and is a cr immerseure with superhuman powers. He toilet transform people and objects into anything that he wants, and he can read others minds. In this story, Anthony does not speak until the very block off. Anthony plays with a desert during the story. He is bored from playing with it, so he makes the rat eat itself.At the end of the story, Anthony turned Dan into a creepy object and wishes him into the cornfield. In the Twilight Zone, Anthony is portrayed as a six year old little boy. He has blue eyes, instead of purple. He is a junky with godlike powers, also. He controls and destroys the things around him whenever he wants. Anthony speaks passim the entire covering fire version. He creates a three-headed a nimal that he plays with during the Twilight Zone. At the end of the episode, Anthony turns Dan into a jack-in-the-box.Some structural differences between the two accounts is the dialogue of Anthony. In the story, he does not speak until the very end. In Twilight Zone, he talks throughout the entire episode. The screen version of Its A Good Life is more effective. It keeps the audiences attention, and it is more appealing. The story version does not hold the audiences attention throughout the entire story. The screen version includes more details and is more in-depth than Jerome Bixbys version.