Education, No child left behind act Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Education, No child left down act - Article ExampleSupreme Court banned racial segregation in human beings schools and determined that the separate but equal doctrine was unconstitutional. On Jan. 8, 2002, professorship Bush signed the No babe Left Behind Act of 2001 into law with tremendous bipartisan support. The final votes were 87-10 in the Senate and 381-41 in the House. Senators Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) and Congressmen George Miller (D-CA) and John Boehner (R-OH) were its chief sponsors in the Senate and the House. (US Department of Education). The main prop wholenessnt of the Act was President George W. Bush. President Bush wanted to expand the program lineal opportunities for all students, including students who are just learning the English spoken language and students who are new to the US. The law ensures that all children regardless of their ethnic and cultural origin can contract a quality education and enhance their academic potential. The Act ref lects the Presidents education reform plan and contains changes to the elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). The NCLB Act enhances the federal governments role in K-12 education by way on school success as measured by student achievement. The Act also contains the Presidents quadruple education reform principles stronger office for results, increased flexibility and local control, expanded options for parents, and an emphasis on teach methods that have been proven to work. With this law, American taxpayers will derive benefits from their heavy investment in education. (Paige and Gibbons, 2004) No Child Left Behind was the successful culmination of a standards-and-testing movement that began with A Nation at encounter report by the Reagan administration in 1983. This push for a standards-based reform gained further support during the 1989 education summit in Charlottesville, Virginia. In that summit, President George H. W. Bush together with the nations governors set p erformance goals for American schools. By 1991, President Bushs America 2000 proposal included voluntary national testing tied to world disunite standards. President Clinton signed into law Goals 2000, which provided grants to help states develop academic standards. With the 1994 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the states were mandatory to develop content and performance standards for K-12 schools. Congress adopted the passable yearly progress that became the linchpin of accountability in No Child Left Behind. States were mandated to make substantial progress toward the goal of academic development for all students. However, at that time, there was no deadline for these standards to be met. Several states which were supposed to pass the standards failed to meet these standards. (Paige and Gibbons, 2004).Features of the jurisprudence The first feature of the NCLB is that it demanded greater accountability by increasing the annual goals for student a chievement. Schools and districts register adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward meeting set targets. Educators must meet their targets. NCLB has set minimum standards for teacher quality. These standards serve well local educational agencies such as districts on decisions covering curriculum, textbooks and materials. These standards constitute a starting floor for developing assessments to measure student mastery. Annual assessments are done and all students are classified into one of these performance levels. NCLB requires all